The biological diversity of dry and sub-humid lands
The Conference of the Parties
1.
Adopts the proposed process for the periodic assessment of the
status and trends of biological diversity, in dry and sub‑humid lands, as
described in table 1 below, taking into account national laws,
policies and programmes and recognizing the urgency for action in
those countries severely affected by land degradation, focusing on
strengthening the capacities of developing countries and countries
with economies in transition to conduct assessments at the national
level and build on the knowledge and structures of ongoing global
assessments, as well as national assessments;
2. Adopts
the proposal prepared by the Executive Secretary for the further
refinement of the programme of work and suggesting collaborating
partners as indicated in the annex to the present
decision;
3. Requests
the Executive Secretary to ensure that the parts of the programme
of work relating to other thematic programmes of work of the
Convention are taken into account when developing and reviewing
these programmes of work;
4. Requests
the Executive Secretary, in consultation with Parties, to develop
targets for the implementation of the programme of work, taking
into account especially national action programmes to combat
desertification, the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation, the
Global Taxonomy Initiative, the Strategic Plan of the Convention,
as well as the Plan of Implementation of the World Summit on
Sustainable Development, for consideration by the Subsidiary Body
on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice. Such a
process could follow the approach taken in the development of the
Global Strategy for Plant Conservation (decision VI/9, annex) and
be in line with decision VII/8, on monitoring and
indicators;
5. Requests
the Executive Secretary, in collaboration with the secretariats of
the other Rio conventions and other biodiversity related
conventions, to further develop mechanisms for facilitating the
synergistic implementation of these conventions, especially at the
national level, as described in sections III and IV of the
note by the Executive Secretary on dry and sub-humid lands prepared
for the eighth meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific,
Technical and Technological Advice (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/8/10).
Such mechanisms could include:
(a) Joint
work programmes at the national level as appropriate;
(b) The
activities of the joint liaison group of the three Rioconventions and potential
additional members, and
(c) Joint
activities with a focus on several elements:
(i) Integration of
activities related to national biodiversity strategies and action
plans with national action programmes for the Convention to Combat
Desertification, national adaptation programmes of action under the
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Ramsar
wetland policies and other relevant programmes, including national
strategies for sustainable development and poverty
reduction;
(ii) Capacity-building,
information systems, institutional arrangements and joint planning
activities between the coordinating bodies and focal points of the
conventions;
(iii) Development of criteria
for synergy projects and development and application of "good
practice" synergy projects at the national level;
(iv) Sound preparation,
formulation of objectives, organization and follow-up of national
and regional synergy workshops;
(v) Training courses and
awareness-raising among relevant stakeholders;
(vi) Consultation,
decision-making and implementation processes with the full
participation of relevant stakeholders, including indigenous
peoples and local communities, non-Governmental organizations and
the private sector.
These mechanisms should take into
account existing experience, as documented by, inter alia,
the Committee for the Review of the Implementation of the
Convention to Combat Desertification (CRIC), and the
"Operational Guidelines for Expedited Funding of National
Self Assessment of Capacity-building Needs" of the Global
Environment Facility, and the role and responsibilities of the
Global Environment Facility and the Global Mechanism of the
Convention to Combat Desertification in promoting
synergy;
6.
Further requests the Executive Secretary, in collaboration
with the other Rio and other biodiversity related conventions, to
facilitate at the national level the review of the national
biodiversity strategies and action plans under the Convention on
Biological Diversity, in order to harmonize them with the national
action programmes under the Convention to Combat Desertification
and the national adaptation plans of action under the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, with a focus on
poverty alleviation and intersectoral integration;
7.
Recognizes that the effective implementation of this
programme of work is subject to the availability of financial,
technological and human resources, and urges Parties, other Governments countries,
international organizations, and relevant stakeholders that are in
a position to do so to develop partnerships and other means to
provide the necessary support;
8.
Take note of the reports of the Millennium
Ecosystem Assessment and the land degradation assessment in
drylands project (LADA) of the Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations on how they address the assessment needs of the
programme of work on biological diversity of dry and sub-humid
lands, and especially on ways to strengthen national efforts to
conduct assessments;
9.
Welcomes the joint work programme between the
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification and the
Convention on Biological Diversity (UNEP/CBD/COP/7/INF/28)
and Parties and relevant stakeholders to
contribute to the implementation of its components.
Table 1. Proposed process for the periodic
assessment of status and trends of biological diversity in dry and
sub‑humid lands (Phases II-IV will depend on the
recommendations made after completion of
phase I).
Phase I: 2002‑2004
(COP7)
|
1. Invite LADA and the Millennium
Ecosystem Assessment to investigate how the needs of the dry and
sub‑humid lands could be integrated into the ongoing
assessments, emphasizing
proposals and ways to strengthen national efforts to conduct
assessments.
2. Develop proposals for mechanisms(s)
linking national assessment to regional/global assessment/report
processes.
3. Participatory development of draft
guidelines for national assessments, including indicators
initiated.
|
Phase II: 2004‑2006 (COP8)
|
4. Agree to final guidelines for
national assessments and adoption for implementation.
5. Implementation mechanism agreed upon
and functional.
|
Phase III: 2006‑2012
|
6. Data collection, processing and
communication according to agreed guidelines and
mechanisms.
7. In 2010, Parties report on WSSD
biodiversity‑related targets, as appropriate.
8. Global assessment report on status
and trends of biological diversity, including information from
national assessments.
|
Phase
IV: 10-year periodic
assessment reports
|
9. Periodic ten‑year report based
on continuous assessments at national level and
up‑scaling.
|
Annex
SYNTHESIS TABLE OF
EXPECTED OUTCOMES AND TIMEFRAMES, POTENTIAL ACTORS, AND INDICATORS
OF PROGRESS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME OF WORK
ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERISTY OF DRY AND SUB-HUMID
LANDS
Activity
|
Expected outcomes
|
Time-frame
|
Key actors
|
Status
|
Progress
indicators
|
Date
|
|
PART A:
ASSESSMENTS
|
Activity
1. Assessment of status
and trends
|
-
Comprehensive review and assessment
report on status and trends of biological diversity in dry and
sub-humid lands
|
2012
|
FAO,
LADA, MA, Parties, SCBD, UNCCD, TPNs, CGIAR agencies
|
Planned
|
Preliminary
assessment
Draft full
assessment
|
2006
2010
|
|
Activity
2. Areas of
particular value
and/or
under threat
|
-
Review and assessment of areas of
value/under threat
|
2012
|
World Heritage
Centre, MAB Secretariat, WCPA, IUCN, UNEP-WCMC, Parties
|
Planned
|
Draft map and
assessment report
|
2008
|
|
Activity
3. Indicators
|
-
Indicators for assessment of status
and trends fully operational
|
2012
|
FAO,
LADA, MA, Parties,
SCBD.
|
In
progress
|
Draft set of
indicators
|
2004
|
|
Activity
4. Knowledge on processes
that affect
biodiversity
|
-
Reports and publications on the
structure and functioning of dry and sub-humid lands ecosystems,
including the potential impact of climate change and poverty on dry
and sub-humid lands
|
Ongoing
|
Various research
and development institutes, including local knowledge systems,
Parties
|
Ongoing
|
Draft summary
publication
AHTEG on
biodiversity and
climate
change
|
2006
2003
|
|
Activity
5. Benefits derived from
biological diversity
|
-
Compilation of information on local
and global benefits
-
Economic valuation of priority
specific sites
|
2012
|
Various research
and development institutes, including local knowledge systems,
Parties.
|
In
progress
|
AHTEG on dry and
sub-humid lands
Draft
publication
|
2002
2006
|
|
-
Assessment of the socio-economic
impact of biodiversity loss and linkage to poverty
|
2006
|
Parties, various
research and development institutes, including local knowledge
systems
|
In
progress
|
AHTEG on dry and
sub-humid lands
Draft
report
|
2002
2005
|
|
-
Case-studies on inter-linkages
between biodiversity loss and poverty
|
2006
|
Parties,
collaborating partners including WIPO, SCBD
|
Planned
|
Submission of
case-studies
from
Parties
|
2005
|
|
Activity
6. Best management
practices
|
-
Case-studies including consideration
of traditional knowledge
-
Guidelines for assessment of good
practices
-
Case-studies of applied Ecosystem
Management Approach
|
2006
2004
|
Parties,
collaborating partners including WIPO, SCBD
SCBD, Parties,
TWNSO, GEF
|
Planned
Planned
|
Submission of
case-studies from Parties
Draft
guidelines
|
2005
2003
|
|
PART B: TARGETED
ACTIONS
|
Activity
7. Measures for
conservation and sustainable use
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Protected areas
|
-
Guidelines on establishment of
"adequate and effective protected areas
networks"
|
2008
|
WCPA,
Environmental conventions, IUCN, World Heritage, MAB
Sec.
|
In
process
|
Protected areas
report
|
2012
|
-
Additional protected area
established
|
Ongoing
|
Parties
|
Ongoing
|
|
|
(b) Rehabilitation and/or
restoration
|
-
Report and database on appropriate
technologies and transfer mechanisms
|
2002
Ongoing
|
Norway, SCBD, Parties and various collaborating
partner
|
Ongoing
|
Workshop on
transfer of technologies
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Evaluation of effectiveness of
measures at test sites
|
|
Parties
|
Proposed
|
Sites established; exchange visits between affected
countries
|
2008
|
-
Measures implemented through NBSAPs
and NAPs
|
|
Parties
|
Proposed
|
Explicit
rehabilitation Project implemented worldwide
|
2008
|
(c) Invasive alien
species
|
-
Increased information and information
exchange on invasive alien species
|
Ongoing
|
Parties,
supported by GISP
|
In
progress
|
Workshops, CHM
includes explicit information
|
2008
|
-
Guidelines and mechanisms for best
management; integration through NBSAPs
|
2008
|
Parties,
GISP
|
In
progress
|
Draft
guidelines
|
2006
|
(d) Production
systems
|
-
Operational guidelines on sustainable
use, good farming practices, integrated production system and
drought preparedness
|
2004
|
Parties, FAO,
CGIAR centres, WB, various research institutes
|
In
progress
|
Draft
guidelines
|
2003
|
-
Progress report on development of
incentives, including "fair and equitable"
markets
|
2004
|
Parties
|
Proposed
|
Draft resource
paper; 3rd National Reports
|
2006
|
(e) Water
resources
|
-
Guidelines on management and
sustainable use of water resources implemented
|
|
Parties, Ramsar
and other environmental conventions, GIWA, research
institutes
|
Proposed
|
Guidelines
drafted
|
2008
|
-
Case-studies on best practices
available
|
|
Parties
|
Proposed
|
Submission of
case-studies by Parties
|
2007
|
(f) In situ and
ex situ conservation
|
-
Guidelines for in situ and
ex situ conservation and management needs based on best
practices implemented
|
|
WCPA,
IUCN, WWF, CGIAR centres, Parties
|
Proposed
|
Draft
guidelines
|
2006
|
-
Capacities of zoos and seedbanks and
other institutions for ex situ conservation
strengthened
|
|
Parties,
regional centres
|
Proposed
|
Integration into
NBSAP and NAP
|
2008
|
(g) Economic valuation
and adaptive technologies
|
-
Study on economic valuation of goods
and services in areas of specific value for biodiversity
|
|
Parties, WB, various research and
development institutes
|
Proposed
|
Draft report by AHTEG
|
2002
|
|
-
Guidelines for the use of economic
instruments implemented through NBSAP
|
|
Parties, various research and development
institutes
|
Proposed
|
Draft guidelines
|
2006
|
(h) Plant and animal
biomass
|
-
Case studies on best
practices
|
|
Parties, various collaborating
partners
|
Proposed
|
|
|
-
Incorporation of lessons learnt in
NBSAPs and NAPs
|
|
Parties
|
Proposed
|
|
|
(i) Training, education
and public awareness
|
-
Training programmes nationally and
regionally in place
|
|
Parties, regional centres of excellence,
TPN of UNCCD, GM
|
Proposed
|
Training workshops per year per
region
|
2006
|
-
Public awareness campaigns on the
importance of dry and sub-humid lands biodiversity
|
|
Parties, CBD,
UNCCD
|
Proposed
|
Year of
biodiversity in dry and sub-humid lands
|
|
(j) Information on
sustainable use
|
-
Development of information exchange
mechanisms
|
|
Parties,
sub-regional organizations, TPNs
|
Planned,
ongoing
|
TPNs discuss 2
themes relevant to PoW per year
|
2008
|
(k) Promotion of
research and development programmes
|
-
Research priorities
established
|
|
Parties,
research and development institutes
|
Planned,
ongoing
|
Partnerships for
collaborative research
|
|
|
-
Pilot projects developed and
implemented on local level
|
|
Parties
|
Planned,
ongoing
|
Demonstration
sites per region per year
|
2006
|
(l) Integrated catchment
management and endangered species
|
-
Case-studies on (i) integrated
catchment management, (ii) migratory species corridors, (iii)
conservation of rare and endangered species
|
|
Parties
|
Proposed
|
Case-studies per
region documented
|
2006
|
(m) Cooperation with
relevant conventions
|
-
Memoranda of Cooperation (MoC) with
relevant conventions
|
|
Various
conventions
|
In
progress
|
|
|
-
Joint work programme with relevant
conventions
|
|
Various
conventions
|
In
progress
|
Synergy
workshops
Pilot synergy
projects
|
|
Activity
8. Promotion
of responsible resource management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Local institutional
structures; and indigenous and local techniques
|
-
Case-studies in place and success
stories documented and shared
|
|
Parties
|
Proposed
|
Regional level
exchange
Visit programmes
in place
|
2006
|
-
Broad implementation through NBSAPs
and NAPs
|
|
Parties,
GM
|
Proposed
|
|
|
(b) Decentralization of
management
|
-
Case-studies and success stories of
community-based management of resources
-
Case studies on the effect of
users' access to land and water resources
|
|
Parties
|
Proposed
|
Publication of
case-study; exchange visits to sites
|
2006
|
(c) Institutions for
land tenure and conflict resolution
|
-
Case-studies and success stories of
strengthened national organization structures
|
|
Parties
|
Proposed
|
Workshops
demonstrating case examples
|
2008
|
(d) Transboundary
issues
|
Guidelines on transboundary
collaboration implemented through NBSAPs and NAPs
|
|
Parties, WCPA, IGOs
|
Proposed
|
Draft guidelines
|
2008
|
|
Increased number of bilateral and
subregional collaborative arrangements in place
|
|
Parties
|
Ongoing
|
|
|
(e) Policies and
instruments
|
Mechanisms for collaboration between
respective national focal points developed
|
|
Parties, SCBD,
UNCCD, GM
|
In
process
|
Synergy
workshops held per annum
|
2004
|
Case-studies, guidelines for
cross-sectoral integration, integration of NBSAPs and
NAPs
|
|
Parties
|
In
process
|
Presentation of
first case-studies (UNCCD CRIC 1)
|
2002
|
Activity
9. Support
for sustainable livelihoods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Income
diversification
|
-
Case-studies on income
diversification
|
|
Parties
|
Proposed
|
Initial
case-studies reported on
|
2006
|
-
Guidelines for income diversification
opportunities implemented through NBSAP and NAPs
|
|
Parties
|
Proposed
|
Draft
guidelines
|
2008
|
(b) Sustainable
harvesting
|
-
Guidelines on best practices
incorporated in NBSAPs, NAPs and other relevant policies
|
|
Parties
|
Proposed
|
Draft
guidelines
|
2004
|
(c) Innovations for
local income generation
|
-
Relevant case-studies made
available
|
|
Parties
|
Proposed
|
Workshops and
exchange visits
|
2006
|
(d) Market
development
|
-
Products derived from sustainable use
increasingly marketed
|
|
Parties,
WTO
|
Proposed
|
Initial
case-studies reported on
|
2006
|
-
Conducive market relationships
developed
|
|
Parties,
WTO
|
Proposed
|
|
|
(e) Fair and equitable
sharing of the benefits
|
-
Guidelines produced and integrated in
NBSAPs, NAPs and other relevant policies
|
|
Parties,
SCBD
|
Proposed
|
Draft
guidelines
|
2006
|
Indicative list of potential
collaborators [2]/
and abbreviations
CBD=Convention on Biological Diversity;
CCD=Convention to Combat Desertification; CGIAR=Consultative Group
on International Agricultural Research; CIAT=International Centre
for Tropical Agriculture; CIFOR=Centre for International Forestry
Research; CILSS=Permanent Inter‑State Committee for Drought
Control in the Sahel; CITES=Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora; CMS = Convention on the
Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals;
CPF=Collaborative Partnership on Forests; FAO=Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations; GEF=Global Environment
Facility; GISP=Global Invasive Species Project; GIWA=Global
International Waters Assessment, GM=Global Mechanisms of the UNCCD,
ICARDA=International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry
Areas; ICRAF=International Centre for Research in Agroforestry;
ICRISAT=International Crops Research Institute for the
Semi‑arid Tropics; IFAD=International Fund for Agricultural
Development; IGBP=International Geosphere and Biosphere Programme;
IITA=International Institute for Tropical Agriculture;
ILRI=International Livestock Research Institute;
ILTER=International Long‑term Ecological Research Network,
IPGRI=International Plant Genetic Resources Institute;
IPPC=Integrated Pollution and Prevention Control;
IGO=InterGovernmental organization; IUCN=World Conservation Union;
IUFRO=International Union of Forestry Research Organizations;
LUCC=Land Use and Cover Change Programme (of IGBP); MA=Millennium
Ecosystem Assessment; OIE=World Organization for Animal Health;
OSS=Observatoire du Sahara et du Sahel; SADC=Southern African
Development Community; TPN=Thematic Programme Networks of the CCD;
TWNSO=Third World Network of Scientific organizations; UNDP=United
Nations Development Programme; UNEP=United Nations Environment
Programme; UNEP‑WCMC=World Conservation Monitoring Centre;
UNESCO=United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization; UNESCO-MAB=Man and Biosphere Project; UNFCCC=United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; UNFF=United Nations
Forum on Forests; UNITAR=United Nations Institute for Training and
Research; WB=World Bank; WCPA=World Commission on Protected Areas;
WHC=World Heritage Centre (UNESCO); WIPO=World Intellectual
Property Organization; WMO=World Meteorological Organization;
WRI=World Resource Institute; WTO=World Trade Organization;
WWF=World Wide Fund for Nature
[2]/
As listed in the report of the Ad Hoc Technical Expert Group on the
Biodiversity of Dry and Sub-Humid Lands (UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/8/INF/2)
and updated based on a questionnaire sent out in August
2002.