There is no correct way to create a plan, every situation is different and it is important to modify the plan to fit the circumstances under which the project will operate. The Advanced User Guide provides further information on how to create a management plan.
The following steps are thought key to the development of the management plan.
Identifying the issues Issue identified and the project plan developed can be difficult to separate. The use of the ecosystem approach should begin with an issue. Having identified the issue (or several) it can be assessed against the tasks set out above in Section 3.
Creating a Draft management plan The draft management plan sets out the tasks, determines who should be involved and creates a draft timetable for action.
Timing Choosing the right time to set up a project can be important. Opportunities or circumstances which can help or hinder the project’s success include:
| Political stability |
| New government policies and strategies |
| Re-organisation of government departments and institutions |
The time taken to restore or maintain ecosystems should not be underestimated. Stakeholders should be given realistic timings so that they do not become disillusioned or frustrated by the time taken to put plans into action and for results to be achieved.
Key actors A primary task is to decide which organisation should lead the project’s development and implementation. Reliance should not be placed on one organisation as this can jeopardise its success. Successful projects often have one fully-committed organisation (either governmental or non-governmental) which works with other partner organisations.
Engaging with stakeholders Engage with the stakeholders as early as possible. Initial consultations are vital for ensuring people feel they can contribute to the development of the management plan, especially if it might impact on their activities. Stakeholders can provide ideas and reactions to help develop the project.
Setting Objectives All projects need well-defined and readily identifiable objectives. These and any actions should be agreed through discussions with stakeholders so that an understanding of the issues and actions necessary to address them can be agreed and understood.
Project design The development of the project plan should consider Adaptive management Long-term viability The ultimate aim for any project should be the continuation of the objectives beyond the project’s lifespan. Financial stability is also key to long-term viability.
Defining the boundaries, scope and time scale Although boundaries lead to limitations these can be necessary for managing ecosystems.
Producing the project work plan The first task of the core work team is to produce a work plan, which should be done in a participatory and collaborative manner, using logical framework techniques to facilitate problem analysis and planning.
Reducing risk to project outcomes Risk analysis should be used to identify critical issues/risks to the project.
Monitoring and evaluation Monitoring can be used to assess progress and determine how future management can be developed to meet the project’s goals. The monitoring of activities, aims and objectives should not be fixed but remain adaptable to changing conditions as knowledge, understanding and issues are raised and resolved.
Project Implementation Key concerns in implementing natural resource management projects include Length of time required. Habitat restoration may require 10-15 years of work before results become apparent. Staff competence and commitment is vital to project success The creation of a network of partner agencies and interest groups, which will progressively take on the implementation of the project activities are vital. Political, institutional and community support must be secured to fulfill the project goals and objectives.
Project implementation generally follows a series of stages, some of which overlap and can include several steps. For example
1. | Stage 1
1.2. | produce work plan and develop links with local community |
1.3. | establish advisory committees |
|
2. | Stage 2
2.1. | determine project activities |
2.2 | desk-based actions c. capacity-building d. review project (adapting monitoring and research as required) |
|
3. | Stage 3
3.1. | putting agreed plan into action |
|
4. | Stage 4
4.1. | continuation and forward planning |
4.2. | strategic plan for future initiatives |
|
For further information on the application of the ecosystem approach please see the Advanced User Guide.