Implementation of the NBSAP
The following text is an unofficial courtesy translation provided by the SCBD.
Initiatives taken to implement the CBD include the development of the first National Study on Biological Diversity (1998), which subsequently led to the adoption of the first National Strategy for the Conservation of Biological Diversity and accompanying Action Plan. The primary objective of the Strategy is the establishment and development among all actors (at their respective levels) of a common and rational basis regarding a vision, and an appreciation of the importance of biodiversity.
The Action Plan includes a wide range of activities grouped into six main areas: i) conservation of biological diversity ii) integration of biodiversity conservation and natural resource management iii) management of processes affecting biological diversity iv) improved knowledge and tools to monitor biodiversity management v) mobilization of partners and vi) institutional strengthening for implementation of the Action Plan.
Actions taken to achieve the 2020 Aichi Biodiversity Targets
The following text is an unofficial courtesy translation provided by the SCBD.
Although Tunisia is in the process of updating its NBSAP in the light of what has been learned since 1998, as well as aligning it with the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, it is important to note the efforts that have been undertaken and those that are in process for preserving and conserving the elements of biodiversity.
Indeed, the efforts undertaken since the adoption of the first NBSAP (1998) have focused on numerous programs and projects as highlighted below:
- Prevention of genetic erosion, particularly in the field of agrobiodiversity
• Creation of a gene bank (2007)
• Creation of a network of botanical gardens to preserve the most endangered plant species
• Development of action plans for the preservation of agricultural species (plant and animal)
• Development of the first core of the Red List (2010)
- Ecosystem protection and management through the implementation of several initiatives and projects such as:
• Project on protected areas management (GEF/WB)
• Project on the protection of marine and coastal resources in the Gulf of Gabes (GEF/WB)
• Project on ecotourism promotion and conservation of desert biodiversity (GEF/WB)
• Project contributing to the implementation of the management plan for Chambi National Park (AFD/FFEM/Monaco)
• Analysis of the ecological representativeness and effectiveness of protected areas management in Tunisia (2010)
• Project on the management of oasis ecosystems in southern Tunisia (GEF/WB, 2014)
• Creation of 20 new protected sites
• Designation of 39 new Ramsar sites
- Training, information dissemination and capacity-building in biodiversity, notably including a self-assessment exercise on national capacities to contribute to the preservation of the global environment, enabled the development of a "synergistic" action plan for implementing the three Rio Conventions
- Needs assessment in national capacity-building in biodiversity, establishment of a CHM and an assistance project for the development of a national biosafety framework
Support mechanisms for national implementation (legislation, funding, capacity-building, coordination, mainstreaming, etc.)
The following text is an unofficial courtesy translation provided by the SCBD.
To rationalize the use and exploitation of natural resources in general and particularly biological resources, especially in semi-arid regions characterized by very fragile ecosystems, Tunisia has gradually established a legal arsenal perfectly adapted to these circumstances.
This arsenal is constantly being revised, supplemented and/or enhanced by new provisions for the sustainable management of natural resources and biodiversity.
Therefore, many measures have been adopted over the last 10 years. They relate in particular to the ratification of the Cartagena Protocol, complementary amendments to the Forest Code and the Code on Land Use Management and Urban Development (protection of the maritime domain), the creation of the Regional Research Center in Oasis Agriculture, etc.
Tunisia currently has comprehensive legislation which should allow for the rational exploitation of biological resources and contribute to the conservation of biodiversity.
At present, Tunisia possesses the following legal instruments:
• Forestry Code
• Water Code
• Code on Water and Soil Conservation (CES)
• Code on Land Use Management and Urban Development
• Regulation on public maritime matters
• Specific regulations on:
- Protection of wetlands, with the creation of 40 Ramsar sites
- Protection of biological resources, notably including the Fisheries Law, the law on the organization of the production and marketing of seeds and plants, the regulation on the import-export of seeds and plants, various legal dispositions and regulations on the creation of marine and terrestrial protected areas (national parks, nature reserves, etc.).
Such measures are constantly being reviewed with a view towards their updating, supplemented and/or enhanced by new provisions for the sustainable management of natural resources and biodiversity. In recent years, the following measures have enhanced the legal arsenal:
• Law No. 2002-58 of 25 June 2002 approving the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (JORT No. 52, 25 June 2002)
• Law No. 2003-78 of 29 December 2003 amending and supplementing the Code on Land Use Management and Urban Development (JORT No. 104, 30 December 2003), with a view to protecting areas in the public maritime domain and some components in the public waters domain (lakes, navigation channels, watercourses and reservoirs established on watercourses).
• Decree No. 1748 of 11 August 2003 establishing the National Gene Bank, whose mission is to assess, preserve and assign values to local genetic resources.
• Law No. 2005-13 of 26 January 2005 amending and supplementing the Forestry Code (JORT No. 9, 1 February 2005), according important provisions to various aspects of the Code.
• Decree No. 2005-1747 of 13 June 2005 establishing a national council to combat desertification, pursuant to the provisions of the UNCCD.
• Decree No. 2006-1431 of 22 May 2006 establishing the Regional Centre of Research on Oasis Agriculture, its organization and manner of operations.
• Law No. 49-2009 on the establishment of marine and coastal protected areas.
Tunisia is currently finalizing the development of an Environment Code which will certainly strengthen the achievements in these domains.
A priori in Tunisia, as elsewhere, stakeholders with an interest in biodiversity comprise a wide and ever-expanding range of institutions and organizations, including public institutions, professional and inter-professional organizations comprised of associations of biodiversity users (farmers, ranchers, manufacturers, merchants, etc.), civil society associations with notably groups of producers and non-governmental organizations.
Biodiversity stakeholders can be classified into three groups:
- Public sector institutions, including administrative structures and development and support structures concerned primarily with the management of biodiversity components (agriculture, mountain, arid zones, etc.)
- Institutions of higher education in agronomy and scientific research institutes equipped with laboratories and specialized research units, particularly concerned with knowledge and, to some extent, the conservation of the different components of biodiversity in different environments at both national and regional levels.
- Mixed institutions, including inter-professional organizations and specialized technical centers, primarily concerned with the use of some elements of agrobiodiversity at national and/or regional or local levels.
- Private sector and civil society institutions, including professional organizations and grassroots organizations, such as the Agricultural Development Group (GDA), primarily concerned with the use and valuation of certain biodiversity resources (production, processing, trade, etc.).
- Grassroots organizations of civil society (NGOs) particularly involved in awareness-raising on biodiversity and, to some extent, the valuation and conservation of certain biodiversity resources at the local level.
In addition:
- Consultative bodies at different levels that can play a certain role in biodiversity management.
- International and/or regional organizations that support national institutions in the field of biodiversity.
Capacity in biodiversity management and conservation
Tunisia has significant capacity, with stakeholders consisting of simple users (farmers, ranchers, etc.) to policy-makers through to development officers, project and programme developers, administrators, planners and strategists, covering various fields such as agricultural and agro-forestry-pastoral production, agronomic research and scientific research in biology, development economics, etc.
Biodiversity capacity in Tunisia is increasing; programmes to upgrade and strengthen means and capacity adapted for sustainable biodiversity management are a part of the country’s biodiversity policy.
In terms of individual capacity, Tunisia possesses significant assets in expertise that covers all topics of biodiversity.
There is good engagement from all actors as well as a deeper commitment towards NBSAP implementation through established mechanisms, which should be supported and strengthened.
There is commendable interest in the development of traditional knowledge and the promotion of quality of life through the sustainable and rational use of all biodiversity elements. A study on the inventory of local agricultural genetic resources and the elaboration of an action plan for their conservation and valuation, undertaken by the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development (MEDD) in 2007-2008, addressed this issue with respect to local agrobiodiversity.
Indeed, it is through such knowledge and practices that many local varieties (e.g. Baklouti pepper, Chaâbani pepper, Moknine melon and pear, varieties of Djérid/Gabes dates, varieties of apricot, etc.) have been created and have survived to the present day. They were maintained because of their importance in local and regional socioeconomic life, serving as the basis for food and/or for traditional trade systems. These measures should be promoted in terms of the use of best practices and traditional knowledge on biodiversity, and also better assessed in terms of values.
Mechanisms for monitoring and reviewing implementation
The following text is an unofficial courtesy translation provided by the SCBD.
A number of institutions involved in biodiversity management, in one way or another, have developed or are developing indicators for monitoring certain biodiversity components, particularly within the context of specific projects. Such is the case with the Directorate General for Forestry, National Institute for Research in Rural Water and Forestry Engineering, Directorate General for the Environment and Quality of Life, National Agency for Environmental Protection, Agency on Coastal Protection and Management, National Gene Bank, etc.
In 2002, the General Directorate for Forestry adopted six indicators for monitoring the sustainable management of Tunisian forests, and forest and para-forest ecosystems, and is currently in the process of updating this strategy with new targets and indicators.
Some monitoring indicators
- Indicators for monitoring protected areas
These indicators pertain to 3 national parks (Ichkeul, Bouhedma, Jbil) that are the subject of a planning and management project on protected areas (PGAP), co-financed by the GEF/IBRD for a five-year period (2003-2008 ), which therefore should see the project implemented in the short term.
- Strengthening of the institutional capacity for administering sustainable protected areas management
- Restoration and ecosystem management in the three parks to protect the flora and fauna, support for the development of ecotourism activities, and formulation of community development plans with local communities that revolve around sustainable biodiversity conservation
- Awareness-raising and strengthening of public support for biodiversity conservation at local and regional levels
A number of indicators to achieve the above objectives have been adopted, including:
- Stabilization or improvement of the demographic status of settlements
- Main biological indicators considered for parks, particularly vegetation cover and the distribution of animal/bird populations for each national park, and water management for Ichkeul National Park
- Percentage of annual work programme activities assigned or transferred to local communities
- Participatory process for management plans and annual work programme (across the local development council and project management team)
- Number of private tourism concessions in each of the three parks
- Overall improvement in the effectiveness of protected areas management as defined by the "IUCN SCORECARD”
- The creation of permanent delegated conservation posts in the three parks that will be responsible for public and community relations
The use of these indicators should be followed up by structures involved in project implementation, primarily the Directorate General of Forests and its local and regional structures involved with national parks.
Indicators for monitoring the ecology and biodiversity in coastal, lagoon and island environments
Regarding specific projects for developing and managing coastal, lagoon and island ecosystems that focus on the understanding and characterization of the ecosystem, indicators for monitoring biodiversity have been developed or are in development. This is particularly the case for the following projects:
- Project for the protection of marine and coastal resources in the Gulf of Gabes
- Conservation project for wetlands and coastal ecosystems in the Mediterranean Basin (MedWetCoast)
- Regional project for the development of maritime zones and protected coasts in the mediterranean region
The indicators in question relate primarily to the monitoring of biodiversity in the ecosystems under consideration, notably flora and fauna, habitat and species status.
These projects involve a number of institutions, mainly the Directorate General for the Environment and Quality of Life, Agency on Coastal Protection and Management, International Centre for Environmental Technologies (Tunis), National Institute of Sea Sciences and Technologies, among others, which should ensure an increase in the use of the indicators in question for the sites under consideration and establish appropriate monitoring devices.
Regarding the updating of the National Biodiversity Strategy that is currently underway, the following outcomes are expected in 2014:
- Identification of national goals
- Identification of national indicators
- Updating of the status of locations of elements of biodiversity