Implementation of the NBSAP
The content of this biodiversity profile is still draft. The text below has been prepared by SCBD and remains subject to final approval by the Party concerned.
Biodiversity objectives established for Romania, in order of priority, include: the development of the legislative framework and institutional capacity; the organization of the national network of protected areas; the conservation of species with high economic value; the integration of the NBSAP into national, sectoral and local strategies and policies; and the protection, conservation and restoration of biodiversity outside protected areas and of biodiversity specific to agro-systems.
Existing efforts are important however are not properly consolidated to support decision-making processes. Therefore, a comprehensive Clearing-House Mechanism is an urgent priority to overcome this current deficiency and will be established through the UNDP-GEF project on support for alignment of the NBSAP with CBD obligations and development of the CHM.
Actions taken to achieve the 2020 Aichi Biodiversity Targets
The content of this biodiversity profile is still draft. The text below has been prepared by SCBD and remains subject to final approval by the Party concerned.
Water quality is evaluated according to the methodology and principles of the Integrated Monitoring System of Waters in Romania (SMIAR), which was restructured according to the requirements of the European Directives. The national system for water monitoring consists of two types of monitoring: surveillance monitoring with the aim of evaluating the state of all water bodies within hydrographic basins, and operational monitoring of water bodies that fail to achieve the objective of water protection.
The project “Identifying Important Areas for Plant Protection and Conservation in Romania” was coordinated at the national level by the Association of Romanian Botanical Gardens (ARBG), and involved experts from 16 institutions in the field (ministries, universities, research institutes, botanical gardens, national parks). The project contributed to the alignment of scientific research on flora and vegetation with international standards, and helped to identify, based on scientific grounds, some areas in Romania which should be prioritized for vegetal diversity conservation at global and European levels. A total of 276 IPAs (Important Plant Areas) have been identified, covering 5% of the country, of which 210 are located within protected areas. Further to this, the implementation of a database project to manage data on identified IPAs, assess their current state of protection and support further measures, provides government institutions with the necessary scientific information to implement the objectives of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation.
Responsibility concerning environmental protection falls under the central authority for environmental protection and its territorial agencies. The central authority consults centralized specialized responsible authorities, elaborates technical regulations for the protection, conservation and sustainable use of natural resources. Landholders (with any title) who apply conservation measures established by the central authority for the environmental protection are tax-exempt, while private landholders are compensated according to the value of the restoration work carried out.
Air quality in Romania is monitored hourly or daily at 51 stations, 23 of which are part of the automated air quality monitoring network. Pollutants such as SO2, NO2/NOx, CO, benzene, suspension powders, lead and ozone pollutants are monitored and evaluated in accordance with the Order of the Minister of Waters and Environmental Protection No. 592/2002 aligned with the requirements stipulated in European Regulations. In monitored areas, air quality has slightly improved except in relation to nitrogen oxides. Some energy-intensive industries have reduced their activities which has resulted in a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.
Tourism infrastructure often requires large land areas and, in order to compensate for the destruction of landscape and ecological functions, “in kind” benefits may be asked for, such as the establishment of new biotopes or the expansion of existing ones. The area where such measures are enforced is protected from long-term intensive utilization. A system often applied is the “Polluter Pays Principle” however it is recognized that this is not a way to create regular additional incomes for implementing conservation projects.
Orders for establishing the prohibition period for fishing, issued by the Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of Environment, are updated annually.
Support mechanisms for national implementation (legislation, funding, capacity-building, coordination, mainstreaming, etc.)
The content of this biodiversity profile is still draft. The text below has been prepared by SCBD and remains subject to final approval by the Party concerned.
Romania has a comprehensive legal framework that can be directly or indirectly applied to environmental protection. There is however a lack of clear regulations for ensuring actions regarding technical and scientific cooperation. Also, there is an unbalanced distribution of investments in the field of nature conservation, and the capacity of institutions to attract financial resources is insufficiently developed. Romania has benefited from GEF technical and financial assistance for enabling activities.
Despite existing databases for biodiversity, there is no coordination point for data integration and information management in Romania. The major difficulties are related to unclear land ownership within and near protected areas, insufficient staff (particularly in Park Administration Units), reorganization of environmental agencies and lack of economic compensation mechanisms.
Mechanisms for monitoring and reviewing implementation
The content of this biodiversity profile is still draft. The text below has been prepared by SCBD and remains subject to final approval by the Party concerned.
A system for biodiversity monitoring has not yet been established, however some wild species and habitats are included in programs and research projects undertaken by universities, museums, research institutes and some NGOs.